中国P站

Microbial biofilms; drinking water systems; antibiotic resistance genes; disinfection by-products; pipe materials; control strategies; water quality; public health; microbially induced corrosion; metagenomic sequencing

Introduction

Microbial biofilms play a critical role in drinking water distribution systems, with their formation mechanisms, influencing factors, and associated risks to water quality and public health being a primary focus of research [1] . A comprehensive understanding of these mechanisms is vital, particularly as reviews detail the diverse microbial communities involved and the environmental conditions that promote biofilm growth. This also extends to recent advancements in detection methods and control strategies, offering insights into future management directions [2] . The influence of disinfection by-products (DBPs) on microbial communities and the proliferation of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) within these biofilms is also a significant concern, given that DBP exposure can alter biofilm structure and enhance ARG dissemination, raising public health concerns [3] . Beyond chemical influences, the physical environment also matters. Different pipe materials, for instance, significantly impact the microbial community structure and functional capabilities of biofilms, with surface properties selectively enriching specific bacterial taxa and influencing metabolic pathways. This offers valuable insights for material selection to mitigate water quality issues [4] . Further characterization of bacterial communities and ARGs in drinking water biofilms, particularly through advanced metagenomic sequencing, has revealed a diverse resistome. This highlights the potential for these systems to act as reservoirs and disseminators of antibiotic resistance, which is crucial for public health risk assessment [5] . Effective control strategies are equally important. Evaluations of physical and chemical methods, such as flushing, scraping, and advanced oxidation processes, detail their mechanisms, advantages, and limitations, consistently advocating for an integrated approach to enhance water quality and system integrity [6] . Furthermore, microbial biofilms contribute to microbially induced corrosion (MIC) in distribution systems, leading to pipe material degradation. Understanding key influencing factors and outlining various control strategies emphasizes the need for a comprehensive grasp of biological and electrochemical interactions to mitigate costly infrastructure damage and ensure water quality [7] . The interplay between disinfection practices and antibiotic resistance is complex. Studies investigate how disinfectant exposure influences the dynamics of ARGs and microbial communities within biofilms, revealing that common disinfectants can exert selective pressures, alter biofilm composition, and potentially enrich for specific ARGs [8] . Looking ahead, innovative and emerging strategies for biofilm control are being explored. These include bacteriophages, quorum sensing inhibitors, and engineered surfaces, all designed to overcome the limitations of conventional disinfection methods and improve water safety and infrastructure longevity [9] . Ultimately, identifying and discussing the various environmental, operational, and microbial factors that significantly influence biofilm formation provides an overview of existing and emerging control strategies, stressing the importance of these complex interactions for developing more effective and sustainable management approaches [10] .

Description

Microbial biofilms represent a pervasive and critical challenge within drinking water distribution systems, with their presence significantly impacting water quality and posing potential risks to public health. Research consistently highlights the intricate mechanisms governing their formation, the diverse microbial communities they harbor, and the various environmental and operational factors that actively promote their growth [1, 2, 10]. Understanding these fundamental aspects is key to addressing the widespread issues associated with biofilms. The composition and structure of these biofilms are highly dynamic, responding to a multitude of external influences. For example, the type of pipe material used in distribution systems plays a significant role in shaping the microbial community and its functional capabilities. Studies show that different pipe surface properties can selectively enrich specific bacterial taxa, which in turn influences metabolic pathways within the biofilm [4]. Additionally, chemical factors such as disinfection by-products (DBPs) and the routine exposure to disinfectants are known to profoundly alter biofilm structures. These chemical pressures can significantly impact microbial communities and, crucially, enhance the selection and dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) [3, 8]. A major public health concern arises from the established role of drinking water biofilms as reservoirs and potential disseminators of antibiotic resistance. Advanced metagenomic sequencing has been instrumental in thoroughly characterizing the bacterial communities and identifying a diverse array of ARGs present within these biofilms. This research unequivocally highlights the potential for these systems to contribute to the broader challenge of antibiotic resistance, demanding careful public health risk assessment [5]. Beyond biological contamination, biofilms also pose a significant threat through microbially induced corrosion (MIC). This process, where bacterial biofilms actively contribute to the degradation of pipe materials, leads to costly infrastructure damage and further compromises water quality. A comprehensive understanding of these biological and electrochemical interactions is therefore essential for effective mitigation [7]. Given these multifaceted challenges, a wide range of control strategies are continuously developed and evaluated. These include established physical methods such as flushing and scraping, alongside chemical approaches like advanced oxidation processes, each with their own mechanisms, advantages, and limitations [6]. Furthermore, innovative and emerging strategies are actively being explored to overcome the shortcomings of conventional disinfection. These novel approaches include the use of bacteriophages, quorum sensing inhibitors, and the development of engineered surfaces designed to actively deter biofilm formation. Such advancements promise to improve water safety and extend infrastructure longevity [9]. Ultimately, effective biofilm management hinges on a holistic and integrated approach. Researchers consistently advocate for the synergistic combination of chemical, physical, and biological methods to achieve sustainable water safety and maintain the integrity of distribution systems [1, 2, 6, 9]. This integrated perspective requires a deep and continuous understanding of microbial dynamics, the diverse factors influencing biofilm formation, and the complex interplay between disinfection practices and the persistence of antibiotic resistance. Such a comprehensive and adaptive strategy is crucial for developing robust and future-proof solutions to biofilm-related challenges in water infrastructure [10].

Conclusion

Microbial biofilms represent a significant and pervasive challenge within drinking water distribution systems, profoundly impacting both water quality and public health. These complex microbial communities adhere to pipe surfaces, forming through intricate mechanisms that are influenced by a diverse range of environmental and operational factors. Research explicitly details how elements like pipe materials, disinfection by-products (DBPs), and the presence of disinfectants play a critical role in shaping their growth and overall composition. For instance, studies show that specific pipe surface properties can selectively enrich certain bacterial taxa, while exposure to DBPs and various disinfectants has been demonstrated to alter biofilm structure, often promoting the proliferation and dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs). A paramount concern stemming from these biofilms is their established role as reservoirs for ARGs. Metagenomic investigations have effectively characterized a diverse array of resistance genes within drinking water biofilms, underscoring a tangible public health risk related to the spread of antibiotic resistance. Beyond the biological implications of water quality, biofilms are also significant contributors to microbially induced corrosion (MIC), leading to the degradation of essential pipe infrastructure and subsequently incurring substantial economic costs for repair and replacement. To effectively counteract these multifaceted challenges, a broad spectrum of control strategies is continuously explored and implemented. These encompass conventional physical methods, such as routine flushing and mechanical scraping, alongside chemical treatments like advanced oxidation processes. Furthermore, innovative and emerging approaches are gaining traction, including the application of bacteriophages, quorum sensing inhibitors, and the development of engineered surfaces designed to deter biofilm adhesion. There is a strong consensus across the research that an integrated management strategy, which synergistically combines various chemical, physical, and biological methods, is indispensable for achieving sustainable water safety and ensuring the long-term integrity of distribution systems. A comprehensive and nuanced understanding of biofilm formation dynamics, the influencing factors, and the complex interactions within these water systems is therefore crucial for developing truly effective and future-proof solutions.

References

1. Yu-Ting L, Ru-Fen C, Fang-Jie L (2023) .Water Res 245:120464.

   , ,

2. Mengmeng X, Yulin Z, Long H (2022) .J Clean Prod 366:133221.

   , ,

3. Yanan C, Guang L, Longfei S (2021) .Environ Pollut 284:116848.

   , ,

4. Yuancai W, Xinyue S, Yue Z (2020) .Water Res 179:116491.

   , ,

5. Linlin L, Jianlong W, Xinyuan L (2023) .Environ Sci Technol 57:8251-8260.

   , ,

6. Jinlong W, Ru-Ping C, Fang-Jie L (2022) .Chemosphere 304:135061.

   , ,

7. Yu-Ting L, Ru-Fen C, Fang-Jie L (2021) .Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 51:2793-2826.

   , ,

8. Yuancai W, Xinyue S, Yue Z (2023) .Sci Total Environ 902:167097.

   , ,

9. Jinhui C, Yongxiao W, Junwei L (2022) .J Environ Manage 315:115049.

   , ,

10. Mengmeng X, Lingling T, Long H (2019) .Water Res 161:474-489.

    , ,