中国P站

Heavy Metal Contamination; Water Pollution; Remediation Strategies; Ecosystem Health; Human Health Risk; Nanomaterials; Microplastics; Arsenic Contamination; Biosorption; Environmental Monitoring

Introduction

This review discusses the pervasive issue of global metal contamination in water, detailing various sources like industrial discharge and agricultural runoff. It explores the transport mechanisms of metals in aquatic systems, their significant impacts on ecosystems and human health, and evaluates diverse remediation strategies including physical, chemical, and biological approaches to mitigate this environmental threat [1].

This study assessed heavy metal contamination in drinking water sources across communities in Niger State, Nigeria, evaluating potential health risks to consumers. It identified elevated levels of certain metals exceeding regulatory limits, indicating a need for urgent intervention to safeguard public health through improved water treatment and monitoring [2].

This review critically examines the application of advanced nanomaterials in the removal of heavy metals from contaminated water. It covers various types of nanomaterials, their mechanisms of action, and their efficiency in adsorbing or degrading different heavy metal ions, highlighting their potential as next-generation water purification technologies while addressing current challenges [3].

This review investigates the complex interactions between microplastics and heavy metals in aquatic environments. It highlights how microplastics can act as carriers for heavy metals, influencing their transport, bioavailability, and toxicity, thereby posing an aggravated threat to aquatic organisms and human health through food chain accumulation [4].

This review explores the utility of algae as effective bioindicators for assessing heavy metal pollution in aquatic ecosystems. It details how different algal species respond to various metal contaminants, their accumulation mechanisms, and their potential for monitoring environmental health, offering a cost-effective and ecologically relevant approach compared to traditional physicochemical methods [5].

This comprehensive review addresses the severe issue of arsenic contamination in groundwater across various Asian countries, outlining its natural and anthropogenic sources. It details the profound health risks associated with chronic exposure and critically evaluates existing mitigation strategies, including safe water supply alternatives and low-cost removal technologies, to combat this widespread public health crisis [6].

This review focuses on the effective application of agricultural waste biomass for biosorption of heavy metals from industrial wastewater. It evaluates various types of biomass, their surface modifications, and the mechanisms involved in metal binding, highlighting the cost-effectiveness and environmental friendliness of this approach as a sustainable solution for water detoxification [7].

This study investigated the sources, spatial distribution, and ecological risks posed by heavy metals in an urban river system, specifically the Pearl River in China. It identified key anthropogenic inputs leading to elevated metal concentrations and performed a comprehensive risk assessment, highlighting specific areas and metals of concern that require targeted pollution control measures [8].

This review summarizes recent advances in understanding heavy metal toxicity in various aquatic organisms. It delves into the molecular and physiological mechanisms of metal uptake, accumulation, and the resulting oxidative stress, DNA damage, and reproductive impairments, emphasizing the ecological consequences of these contaminants on aquatic biodiversity and ecosystem function [9].

This review systematically evaluates the advancements and applications of passive sampling techniques for monitoring heavy metal contamination in water bodies. It discusses various passive sampler designs, their principles of operation, advantages over traditional grab sampling, and current limitations, demonstrating their potential for long-term and cost-effective environmental surveillance [10].

Description

This review discusses the pervasive issue of global metal contamination in water, detailing various sources like industrial discharge and agricultural runoff. It explores the transport mechanisms of metals in aquatic systems, their significant impacts on ecosystems and human health, and evaluates diverse remediation strategies including physical, chemical, and biological approaches to mitigate this environmental threat [1]. This study investigated the sources, spatial distribution, and ecological risks posed by heavy metals in an urban river system, specifically the Pearl River in China. It identified key anthropogenic inputs leading to elevated metal concentrations and performed a comprehensive risk assessment, highlighting specific areas and metals of concern that require targeted pollution control measures [8].

This study assessed heavy metal contamination in drinking water sources across communities in Niger State, Nigeria, evaluating potential health risks to consumers. It identified elevated levels of certain metals exceeding regulatory limits, indicating a need for urgent intervention to safeguard public health through improved water treatment and monitoring [2]. This comprehensive review addresses the severe issue of arsenic contamination in groundwater across various Asian countries, outlining its natural and anthropogenic sources. It details the profound health risks associated with chronic exposure and critically evaluates existing mitigation strategies, including safe water supply alternatives and low-cost removal technologies, to combat this widespread public health crisis [6].

This review investigates the complex interactions between microplastics and heavy metals in aquatic environments. It highlights how microplastics can act as carriers for heavy metals, influencing their transport, bioavailability, and toxicity, thereby posing an aggravated threat to aquatic organisms and human health through food chain accumulation [4]. This review summarizes recent advances in understanding heavy metal toxicity in various aquatic organisms. It delves into the molecular and physiological mechanisms of metal uptake, accumulation, and the resulting oxidative stress, DNA damage, and reproductive impairments, emphasizing the ecological consequences of these contaminants on aquatic biodiversity and ecosystem function [9].

This review critically examines the application of advanced nanomaterials in the removal of heavy metals from contaminated water. It covers various types of nanomaterials, their mechanisms of action, and their efficiency in adsorbing or degrading different heavy metal ions, highlighting their potential as next-generation water purification technologies while addressing current challenges [3].

This review focuses on the effective application of agricultural waste biomass for biosorption of heavy metals from industrial wastewater. It evaluates various types of biomass, their surface modifications, and the mechanisms involved in metal binding, highlighting the cost-effectiveness and environmental friendliness of this approach as a sustainable solution for water detoxification [7]. This review explores the utility of algae as effective bioindicators for assessing heavy metal pollution in aquatic ecosystems. It details how different algal species respond to various metal contaminants, their accumulation mechanisms, and their potential for monitoring environmental health, offering a cost-effective and ecologically relevant approach compared to traditional physicochemical methods [5]. This review systematically evaluates the advancements and applications of passive sampling techniques for monitoring heavy metal contamination in water bodies. It discusses various passive sampler designs, their principles of operation, advantages over traditional grab sampling, and current limitations, demonstrating their potential for long-term and cost-effective environmental surveillance [10].

Conclusion

Global metal contamination in water is a pervasive issue stemming from industrial discharge and agricultural runoff. It significantly impacts ecosystems and human health, necessitating diverse remediation strategies including physical, chemical, and biological approaches. Studies show elevated levels of heavy metals in drinking water sources in places like Niger State, Nigeria, exceeding regulatory limits and posing health risks, underscoring the need for improved treatment and monitoring. Advanced nanomaterials offer promising solutions for heavy metal removal, demonstrating efficiency in adsorbing or degrading various metal ions, positioning them as next-generation water purification technologies. Beyond direct contamination, microplastics interact with heavy metals in aquatic environments, acting as carriers that influence metal transport, bioavailability, and toxicity, thereby escalating threats to aquatic life and human health through food chain accumulation. Arsenic contamination in groundwater, particularly across Asian countries, is another critical concern, with both natural and anthropogenic sources leading to profound health risks. Mitigation involves safe water supply alternatives and low-cost removal technologies. Agricultural waste biomass presents an environmentally friendly and cost-effective method for biosorption of heavy metals from industrial wastewater, evaluating various biomass types and their mechanisms. The overall challenge of heavy metal pollution requires continuous monitoring, innovative remediation, and a comprehensive understanding of their complex environmental dynamics.

References

1. Pankaj KS, Ajay K, Vineet S (2022) .Environ. Res. 203:112108.

   , ,

2. S. AO, N. JE, A. UD (2023) .Chemosphere 334:139632.

   , ,

3. Abdulrahman AA, Saleh HA, Mohammed SA (2024) .Chemosphere 345:140228.

   , ,

4. Zhiming T, Xiru L, Yujia Z (2021) .Water Res. 201:117180.

   , ,

5. Shivangi S, Priyanka K, Shiv KS (2020) .J. Environ. Manage. 274:111456.

   , ,

6. Md H, A. HMMR, Md AH (2023) .Sci. Total Environ. 864:161042.

   , ,

7. Seong HK, Jae HP, Young SL (2022) .J. Hazard. Mater. 422:127818.

   , ,

8. Bolin L, Chunshan L, Yonggang Y (2019) .Environ. Pollut. 252:34-43.

   , ,

9. S. MMME, A. RA, M. HM (2021) .Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 221:112461.

   , ,

10. Jong DK, Hye GL, Se YP (2020) .TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 133:115911.

    , ,