Radiology Peer Review: Quality, Safety, and Development
*Corresponding Author: Dr. Henk Visser, Department of Clinical Peer Review, Stellenbosch University, South Africa, Email: h.visser@peerrev.zaReceived Date: Oct 01, 2025 / Published Date: Oct 29, 2025
Citation: Visser DH (2025) Radiology Peer Review: Quality, Safety, and Development. J Radiol 14: 743.DOI: 10.4172/2167-7964.1000743
Copyright: © 2025 Dr. Henk Visser This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Abstract
Radiology peer review is a cornerstone of quality assurance, ensuring diagnostic accuracy and patient safety through independent assessment of reports and images. Structured programs, concurrent review models, and standardized reporting enhance error detection and professional development. While AI offers new possibilities, human expertise remains central. Effective peer review fosters a culture of continuous improvement, mentorship, and reduced litigation risks. Addressing workload challenges and understanding radiologist perspectives are key to optimizing this critical process.
